In re United States’s Empirical Analysis
345 F.3d 450 · 2003
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Nunez v. United States (2008), In re: US v. (2008)
13 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wayte v. United States · United States v. Batchelder · Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp. · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · United States v. Batchelder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`no one can be convicted of a crime without the concurrence of all three branches.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.