Brooks v. Ameren UE’s Empirical Analysis
345 F.3d 986 · 2003
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Kim v. Nash Finch Company · Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc. · Bell v. Bolger · Marion Kelley Jr v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“able to explain, in clear and reasonably specific terms, their reasons for scoring [Torgerson and Mundell] lower than the [hired] candidates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 1002 simply expresses the law’s preference for using the original of a document to prove the contents of that document.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.