345 F. Supp. 294 - Gould v. Barnes Brokerage Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 7 U.S.C. § 1281 (Agricultural Act of 1948) · 7 U.S.C. § 1801 · 7 U.S.C. § 6B
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Mulford v. Smith · Pinel v. Pinel · Bertha Hecht, and v. Harris, Upham & Co., a Partnership, Harris, Upham & Co., Inc., a Corporation, And · Herman Pinel v. Thomas F Pinel F O
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action or proceeding arising under any Act of Congress regulating commerce or protecting trade and commerce against restraints and monopolies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.