345 Ill. App. 3d 782 - People v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 118 Wash. 2d 826 - City of Tacoma v. Luvene · 175 Ill. 2d 60 - People v. Krueger · City of Akron v. Rowland · 177 Ill. 2d 440 - City of Chicago v. Morales · 329 Ill. App. 3d 846 - People v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Joliet ordinance prohibits loitering in a manner and under circumstances manifesting the purpose to engage in drug-related activity. [Citation.] * * * The word manifest means `to make evident or certain by showing or displaying.' Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 707 (10th ed.1997). The word purpose means `something set up as an object or end to be attained'; hence the phrase on purpose means `by intent.' Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 949 (10th ed.1997). These words establish a mens rea element (intent) and require, as a prerequisite to an arrest, that a suspect exhibit some show or display (overt conduct) signaling an intention to engage in drug-related activity. * * * * * * An overt act is required to give the word manifesting its plain and ordinary meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]mong the circumstances which may be considered in determining whether such purpose is `manifested'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.