Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 N.C. 647 - State v. Gaines

State v. Gaines’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

368
cited by 368 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

366 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 368 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Fair (2001), State v. Wallace (2000)

366 state decisions

2050199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Batson v. Kentucky · United States v. Mendenhall · Doyle v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 368 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the definitive inquiry is whether there was a formal arrest or a restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]olice officers are not required to administer Miranda warnings to everyone whom they question. Nor is the requirement of warnings to be imposed simply because the... questioned person is one whom the police suspect. Miranda warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person's freedom as to render him in custody.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.