Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 138 Pa. Super. 156 - Commonwealth v. Sharpe · 91 Okla. Crim. 94 - Carr v. State · 77 Okla. Crim. 343 - Daves v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 61 - Leeth v. State · 86 Okla. Crim. 415 - Lincoln v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ . . . This court has repeatedly held that to entitle the defense of alibi to consideration, the evidence must be such as to show that at the very time of the commission of the crime charged the accused was at another place so far away or under such circumstances that he could not, with ordinary exertion, have reached the place where the crime was committed so as to have participated in the commission thereof. . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fritz v. State““The weight of the evidence and credibility of the witnesses were clearly questions for the jury, and where there is competent evidence in the record from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty as charged, the Criminal Court of Appeals will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ramirez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.