Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

345 So. 2d 1161

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 16, 1977

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1977-05-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1988

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-05-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

TATE, Justice,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I respectfully dissent.

¶3The defendant-was entitled to issuance of the subpoena requested. La.C.Cr.P. arts. 731, 738. The trial judge is without authority to determine that a subpoena should not issue for a witness desired by the defense, whatever might be the trial court’s (reviewable) ruling as to the relevance of testimony sought to be elicited from this witness.

¶4The erroneous denial of the accused’s right to subpoena a witness thought needed by him for his defense is a substantial violation of a statutory right granted to him to present his defense. The erroneous ruling cannot be regarded as harmless, cf. La.C. Cr.P. art. 921.

/345/so2d/1161 · .json · Public domain