Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 345 So. 2d 26 - State v. Weeks

345 So. 2d 26 - State v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2016

18 state decisions

7019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 331 So. 2d 443 - State v. Governor · 322 So. 2d 222 - State v. Roach · 338 So. 2d 654 - State v. Sharp · State v. Refuge · 340 So. 2d 1306 - State v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" Miranda warnings are not a prerequisite to admissibility of statements taken by officers during non-custodial, general on-the-scene investigations, conducted to determine the facts and circumstances surrounding a possible crime, absent a showing that the investigation has passed the investigatory stage and had focused on the accused. State v. Weeks, 345 So.2d 26 (La.1977); State v. Brown, 340 So.2d 1306 (La.1976)."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.