Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

345 So. 2d 788

La Quire v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-04-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1986

1 state decisions

Relies on 328 So. 2d 223 - Watts v. State · Holmes v. State · Heatherly v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial judge placed appellant on probation for a period of seven years, which is in excess of the five year maximum sentence permissible for the offense of uttering a forgery. This court in Holmes v. State, 343 So.2d 632 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) and Heatherly v. State, 343 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), has held such sentences to be excessive. See also Watts v. State, 328 So.2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), Magnin v. State, 334 So.2d 638 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). *789The sentence is hereby modified and reduced to five years probation.

¶2AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD, and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
/345/so2d/788 · .json · Public domain