¶1 ORDER
¶2 Frederick Mays appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 Motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and *401 the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶3 The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).