Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 F.2d 1 - United States v. Crowder

United States v. Crowder’s Empirical Analysis

346 F.2d 1 · 1964

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 173 W. Va. 43 - State v. Kopa (1983), United States v. Dye (1974)

35 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

220196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Berger v. United States · Opper v. United States · Russell v. United States · Hartman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant’s petition for rehearing suggested our consideration of points not directly raised or argued in the District Court or in this Court. We, nevertheless, took notice of them and ordered further argument on the following questions * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Williams, however, repudiated the statement as ‘all a fictitious lie’ when called as a witness at Crowder’s trial. The statement was admitted to impeach Williams’ trial testimony. * * * ff”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “against subsequent jeopardy for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.