Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 F.2d 192 - Wirtz v. Robb

Wirtz v. Robb’s Empirical Analysis

346 F.2d 192 · 1965

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
December 1969
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Malloy v. Hogan · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Linkletter v. Walker · Brown v. United States · Head v. New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No person shall be excused from attending and testifying or from producing books, papers, correspondence, memoranda, contracts, agreements, or other records and documents before the Commission, or in obedience to the subpena [sic] of the Commission or any member thereof or any officer designated by it, or in any cause or proceeding instituted by the Commission, on the ground that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of him may tend to incriminate him or subject him to a penalty or forfeiture; but no individual shall be prosecuted or subject to any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled to testify or produce evidence, documentary or otherwise, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “respondents were assured that a grant of immunity would flow coextensive with their individual testimony”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.