Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 F.2d 861 - United States v. Pugliese

United States v. Pugliese’s Empirical Analysis

346 F.2d 861 · 1965

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably Notaro v. United States (1966), Kadis v. United States (1967)

54 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

3501965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sherman v. United States · Stoner v. California · Masciale v. United States · Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner · United States v. Sherman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) did the agent induce the accused to commit the offense charged in the indictment; (2) if so, was the accused ready and willing without persuasion and was he awaiting any propitious opportunity to commit the offense? On the first question the accused has the burden; on the second the prosecution has it.” 5”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.