Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 F.3d 1 - In Re: Spookyworld, Inc.

In Re: Spookyworld, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 20 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably United States v. Tapia-Escalera (2004), McMullen v. Sevigny (2004)

8 federal appellate · 20 district ·

280200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz · Smith v. Barry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Except as provided in paragraph (2), an individual injured by any willful violation of a stay provided by this section shall recover actual damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, and, in appropriate circumstances, may recover punitive damages.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] mistake in designating a judgment . . . in the notice of appeal ordinarily will not result in loss of the appeal as long as the intent to appeal a specific judgment can be fairly inferred from the notice and [the] appellee is not misled by the [unclear notice],”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.