Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 F.3d 1362 - Prillaman v. Principi

Prillaman v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis

346 F.3d 1362 · 2003

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. Fenton · Hodge v. West · Barnett v. Brown · Barrera v. Gober · Elkins v. West

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “New evidence means existing evidence not previously submitted to agency deci-sionmakers. Material evidence means existing - evidence that, by itself or when considered with previous evidence of record, relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim. New and material evidence can be neither cumulative nor redundant of the evidence of record at the time of the last prior final denial of the claim sought to be reopened, and must raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.