Anderson v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
346 F.3d 315 · 2003
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Thibodeau v. Portuondo (2007), Cox v. Donnelly (2004)
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Remmer v. United States · Patterson v. United States · Lowenfield v. Phelps · Tanner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“cannot be applied in such an unfair manner as to preclude due process.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[cjlearly, then, we believed that threats of violence themselves might be sufficient to overturn a verdict.” Id. The Court also notes that the trial court in Anderson held a hearing to take testimony from a complaining juror. Id. at 318. It is unclear whether the trial judge was aware of the substance of the juror’s allegation before taking her testimony. The record states that the juror approached defense counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.