346 F. Supp. 2d 113 - Hunter v. Sprint Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 255 · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa · Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling · Mooney v. Aramco Services Co. · Lockhart v. Westinghouse Credit Corp. · Does Thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This unique cause of action ... is not subject to the numerosity, commonality, and typicality rules of a class action under Rule 23.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.