Johnson v. Yahoo!, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 227
Relies on Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation v. United States Department of Interior · Santamarina v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · CE Design, Ltd. v. Prism Business Media, Inc. · ACA Int'l v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the equipment pulls numbers from a stored list that was not generated by a random or sequential number generator (and does not have the capacity to generate random or sequential numbers), the equipment does not fit the statutory definition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a system that generated random numbers and did not dial them immediately, but instead stored them for later automatic dialing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“did not have the capacity to generate random or sequential numbers to be dialed-it dialed numbers from a stored list”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.