Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 FSUPP3D 379 - Lett v. Decker

Lett v. Decker’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2019
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 8 U.S.C. § 1225 (§ 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on United States v. Salerno · Shaughnessy v. United States Ex Rel. Mezei · Foucha v. Louisiana · Zadvydas v. Davis · United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although Jennings abrogated the holdings of this and other courts finding an implicit reasonable time limitation on § 1225(b) detention, Jennings did not address ... [whether] those detained under the statute, as applicants for admission, possess some rights under the Due Process Clause which may be impugned should detention under the statute become unduly and unreasonably prolonged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[m]any courts ... have found that [individuals detained pursuant to § 1225(b) ] have Due Process rights that require courts to consider challenges to the length of their detentions, even if the detainees' rights are limited in other respects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Arriving [noncitizen] means an applicant for admission coming or attempting to come into the United States at a port-of-entry, or [a noncitizen] seeking transit through the United States at a port-of-entry[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.