State v. Prevatte’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2019
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Brookhart v. Janis · Smith v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cross-examine [Burr] about these charges and whether [Burr] had been promised or expected anything in regard to the charges in exchange for his testimony in [defendant's] case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“constitutional error not to allow the questions on cross-examination that the defendant proposed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was under indictment in another county on nine charges of forgery and uttering forged checks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.