State v. Bishop’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 206 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 210 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Lawrence (2012), State v. Braxton (2000)
2 federal appellate · 206 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Victor v. Nebraska · Jenkins v. Anderson · Pope v. Nebraska · In re Vey · Modjeski & Masters, Applicant, V
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 210 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) that a different result probably would have been reached but for the error or (ii) that the error was so fundamental as to result in a miscarriage of justice or denial of a fair trial.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage“a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.