State v. Parkins’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Ultimately, the preservation rule is a practical one, and close calls * * * inevitably will turn on whether, given the particular record of a case, the court concludes that the policies underlying the rule have been sufficiently served.”

   11 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 293 Or. App. 369 - State v. Nordholm · 290 Or. App. 121 - State v. Hollingsworth

2. “"The purpose of the preservation rule is the practical one of requiring a defendant to provide an explanation of his or her position specific enough to ensure that the trial court can identify its alleged error with enough clarity to permit it to consider and correct the error immediately, if correction is warranted."”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 293 Or. App. 369 - State v. Nordholm · 294 Or. App. 567 - State v. Dallavis

3. “"clearly intended that criminal records accurately reflect all crimes actually committed and that a person who commits multiple crimes by the same conduct or during the same criminal episode should have a criminal record reflecting each crime committed rather than only a single conviction which would not accurately portray the nature and extent of that person's conduct."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 349 - State v. Cazarez-Lopez