State v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[W]hen the legislature includes an express provision in one statute and omits the provision from another related statute, we assume that the omission was deliberate.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 298 Or. App. 264 - State v. Jones · 295 Or. App. 205 - State v. P. T. (In re P. T.)

2. “We do not suggest that, on other facts and in a different context, a threat made to someone advising her not to report criminal conduct to the police could not be found by a jury to have been made in a knowing attempt also to induce the threatened person to withhold testimony in a future criminal trial. We hold only that, on these facts, that inference could not reasonably be drawn.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 133 Conn. App. 118 - State v. Ortiz

3. “(a) The person knowingly induces or attempts to induce a witness or a person the person believes may be called as a witness in any official proceeding to offer false testimony or unlawfully withhold any testimony; or (b) The person knowingly induces or attempts to induce a witness to be absent from any official proceeding to which the person has been legally summoned.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 133 Conn. App. 118 - State v. Ortiz