State v. Freeman

62                    December 24, 2025              No. 1110

     This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
      pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
           except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

           IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
                   STATE OF OREGON

                STATE OF OREGON,
                Plaintiff-Respondent,
                          v.
          ANTHONY LAGRANT FREEMAN, JR.,
                Defendant-Appellant.
              Lane County Circuit Court
                24CR44471; A185921

     Kamala H. Shugar, Judge.
     Submitted November 14, 2025.
  Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Emily P. Seltzer, Deputy Public Defender,
Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for
appellant.
  Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
     Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
     LAGESEN, C. J.
     Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 

 (2025)                              63

           LAGESEN, C. J.
         Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction entered
after defendant pleaded guilty to first-degree manslaughter
with a firearm and first-degree robbery with a firearm. The
trial court imposed a stipulated sentence of 240 months in
prison on the manslaughter conviction and 90 months in
prison with 36 months of post-prison supervision on the robbery conviction. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to
ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 

, 

(1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP
5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1
           Having reviewed the record, including the trial court
file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, and
taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority
to review, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
See ORS 138.105(5) (“The appellate court has no authority to
review the validity of the defendant’s plea of guilty or no contest, or a conviction based on the defendant’s plea of guilty or
no contest[.]”); ORS 138.105(9) (“The appellate court has no
authority to review any part of a sentence resulting from a
stipulated sentencing agreement between the state and the
defendant.”).
           Affirmed.




   1
     As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel.