State v. Harrison

76                    December 24, 2025              No. 1117

     This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
      pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
           except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

           IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
                   STATE OF OREGON

                     STATE OF OREGON,
                     Plaintiff-Respondent,
                               v.
                 TIFFANY DAWN HARRISON,
                     Defendant-Appellant.
                   Lane County Circuit Court
                     24CR09131; A186101

     Charles M. Zennaché, Judge.
     Submitted November 14, 2025.
  Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Peter G. Klym, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon
Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
  Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
     Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
     EGAN, J.
     Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 

 (2025)                              77

           EGAN, J.
          Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation
and sentencing her to 60 months in prison. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour,

, 

 (1991). The brief does not contain
a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1
         In April 2024, defendant was convicted of attempted
second-degree assault based on her guilty plea. The trial
court sentenced her to 36 months of probation, the conditions of which included reporting to her probation officer as
directed. Several months later, in October 2024, the court
issued an order to show cause why defendant’s probation
should not be revoked based on her failure to report to her
probation officer as directed by the court. The court held a
hearing at which the probation officer testified that defendant failed to report to her since a September 2024 hearing
at which the trial court directed defendant to immediately
report to her probation officer. The trial court revoked probation and sentenced defendant to 60 months in prison.
          Having reviewed the record, including the trial court
file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, we
have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
           Affirmed.




   1
     As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel.