Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 P2D 932 - Boose v. Hanlin

Boose v. Hanlin’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2012

15 state decisions

501959196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neff v. Willmott, Roberts Looney · Hildebrand v. Harrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . we feel this issue is determined more by the import of the allegations contained in the pleading than by the particularity, exactness or ineptness with which they are stated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.