Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 P3D 425 - FOX v. CROWGEY

FOX v. CROWGEY’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Park v. Security Bank and Trust Company · Taliaferro v. Shahsavari · Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co. · Burkett v. Moran · Hallford v. Schumacher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “with sufficient evidence to demonstrate the jury was misled to believe it could award damages intended to punish the School District. Where a jury's award of damages is within the limits of the evidence, we will not invade the jury's province and substitute our judgment as a fact-finding tribunal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] jury's verdict is conclusive as to all disputed facts and conflicting statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reckless disregard for the rights of others,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.