Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 P3D 451 - PADILLA v. CHACON

PADILLA v. CHACON’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co. · State v. Walker · Tammie v. Rodriguez · Johnson v. McDaniel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Affiant further states that [she] does not know and upon diligent inquiry and with due diligent inquiry and with due diligence is unable to ascertain the whereabouts of the said Respondent and is unable, with due diligence, to make service of summons upon said individual within or without the State of Oklahoma by any other method and desires to have service by publication upon said individual.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “at any time, on motion of a party, or any person affected thereby.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.