Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 Pa. 27 - Schearer v. Reading

Schearer v. Reading’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
January 1994
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 1994 · most notably Vega v. BURGETTSTOWN BOROUGH. (1958), Soltis Appeal (1957)

25 state decisions

90194219501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Arant v. Lane · Nicholas v. United States · Detoro v. Pittston · Smith v. Pennsylvania Railroad · Carey v. Altoona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the guise of abolishing his office was, in the face of the simultaneous creation of a new office having the same function but a different appellation, a mere pretense and admittedly invalid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.