Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 Pa. 494 - Usner v. Duersmith

Usner v. Duersmith’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably Fisher v. Hill (1951), Rowles v. Evanuik (1944)

35 state decisions

1201943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. · Miners Savings Bank v. Naylor · Lackawanna County v. James · LaBar v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`interpreted with common sense to carry out the purposes for which they were adopted.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.