Ausborn v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1978
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Willingham v. State · Colston v. State · 57 Ala. App. 4 - Colston v. State · 57 Ala. App. 240 - Oatsvall v. State · Oatsvall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The question itself was objectionable but no objection was made until after the answer. There was no adverse ruling by the court and no motion to strike or exclude. After a question is asked, and a responsive answer given, an objection comes too late, and the trial court will not be put in error absent a motion to exclude or strike an adverse ruling thereon. Oatsvall v. State , 57 Ala. App. 240 , 327 So.2d 735 , cert. denied, 295 Ala. 414 , 327 So.2d 740 (1975); Willingham v. State , 261 Ala. 454 , 74 So.2d 241 (1954)." Ausborn v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 346 So.2d 1191 , 1193 (1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.