Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hayes v. Muller · Little v. Haik · Scurto v. Le Blanc · Ceromi v. Harris · Le Bleu v. Savoie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every transfer of immovable property must be in writing; but if a verbal sale, or other disposition of such property, be made, it shall be good against the vendor, as well as against the vendee, who confesses it when interrogated on oath, provided actual delivery has been made of the immovable property thus sold.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is axiomatic ... that parol evidence is inadmissible ... to show that the vendee was in reality some other person than the person named in the act of sale * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“against or beyond what is contained in the act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.