Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 SO2D 26 - Holliday v. State

Holliday v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1994

8 state decisions

60197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffith v. State · Montgomery v. State · 52 Ala. App. 204 - Loggins v. State · Allison v. State · 23 Ala. App. 162 - Gilbreath v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The principle that permits evidence touching on the reputation of the victim of a homicide in a case where there is evidence of self-defense has not been extended to `general reputation' but is limited to reputation as to particular traits variously denominated as traits of `violence,' `turbulence,' `blood-thirstiness' and the like."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Appellant’s complaint as to a portion of the court’s charge on the subject of reasonable doubt comes too late. Oral instructions, to which no objection is made or exception taken, cannot be reviewed on appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is not entitled to prove the victim's bad general reputation as a whole. . . . He can only prove the victim's bad reputation for violence or some similar trait.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.