Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

346 So. 2d 81

Guth v. Guth

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-03-18

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1977

1 state decisions

Relies on 194 So. 2d 260 - Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Rouse

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We withdraw and vacate our previous opinion filed in this case on December 17, 1976. The court’s former opinion was based upon Section 47.163, Florida Statutes (1975), which was in effect at the time of rendition of the order appealed. However, while the appeal was pending Section 47.163 was repealed effective September 1, 1976.

¶2An appellate court, in reviewing a judgment on direct appeal, will dispose of the casé according to the law prevailing at the time of the appellate disposition, and not according to the law prevailing at the time of rendition of the judgment appealed. Florida East Coast Ry. v. Rouse, 194 So.2d 260 (Fla.1966).

¶3Section 47.163 not being applicable we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting appellee’s petition for change of venue based upon Section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1975).

¶4AFFIRMED.

*82DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., and DURANT, JOSEPH N., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
/346/so2d/81 · .json · Public domain