Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 So. 2d 974 - Gray v. State

346 So. 2d 974 - Gray v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1990

5 state decisions

20197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gilmore v. State · 44 Ala. App. 449 - Harris v. State · Johnson v. State · Wideman v. State · Stone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The indictment alleged in specific terms that the $200.00 taken from Officer William Harris at gunpoint was the personal property of the City of Huntsville, a municipal corporation. There is not one thread, glimmer or scintilla of evidence of the entire record to show that Officer Harris had any connection with the City of Huntsville as agent, servant or employee, or that any official of the City of Huntsville ever turned over to Harris any money in the performance of his duties as an undercover agent. There was no evidence that he ever had custody of any money belonging to the City of Huntsville as agent, bailee or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No proposition of law is more fundamental than the one requiring that the proof at trial must correspond with the material allegations of the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.