Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 U.S. 379 - Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland

Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

2,268
cited by 2,268 later decisions
46
cited 46 times by the Supreme Court
13
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

1,236 federal appellate · 77 district · 64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,268 later decisions (46 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. (1976), Allied Chemical Corporation v. Daiflon Inc (1980)

1,236 federal appellate · 77 district · 64 state decisions — followed in 13 states

547019531960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedIn re Bankers Life & Casualty Co. (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · United States v. Trenton Potteries Co. · Ex parte Fahey

Cited together with Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Will v. United States · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Ex parte Fahey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,268 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “right to issuance of the writ is 'clear and indisputable.'”
    32 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do so.”
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “then every interlocutory order which is wrong might be reviewed under the All Writs Act.”
    31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.