Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 U.S. 389 - Dickinson v. United States

Dickinson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

1,738
cited by 1,738 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

1,140 federal appellate · 151 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,738 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2011 · most notably Witmer v. United States (1955), National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co. (1962)

1,140 federal appellate · 151 district · 36 state decisions

68201953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedDickinson v. United States (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Estep v. United States · Sunal v. Large · Cox v. United States · Rosenberg v. United States

Cited together with Estep v. United States · Witmer v. United States · United States v. Seeger · Cox v. United States · Sicurella v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,738 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has not painted a complete or accurate picture of his activities.”
    68 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““(1) The term ‘duly ordained minister of religion’ means a person who has been ordained, in accordance with the ceremonial, ritual, or discipline of a church, religious sect, or organization established on the basis of a community of faith and belief, doctrines and practices of a religious character, to preach and to teach the doctrines of such church, sect, or organization and to administer the rites and ceremonies thereof in public worship, and who as his regular and customary vocation preaches and teaches the principles of religion and administers the ordinances of public worship as embodied in the creed or principles of such church, sect, or organization. “(2) The term ‘regular minister of religion’ means one who as his customary vocation preaches and teaches the principles of religion of a church, a religious sect, or organization of which he is a member, without having been formally ordained as a minister of religion, and who is recognized by such church, sect, or organization as a regular minister.””
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ * * * he (Dickinson) dedicated approximately 100 hours each month to actual pioneer missionary work — delivering public sermons, door-to-door preaching, conducting home Bible studies. In the remaining 50 hours devoted to religious activities each month, Dickinson studied, planned sermons and discourses, and wrote letters connected with his work. A substantial portion of this time was spent conducting three to four meetings each week of the ‘Company’ or congregation at a public hall in Coalinga. Dickinson arranged for and presided over these meetings, usually delivering discourses at them. He also instructed prospective ministers in the proper delivery of sermons at the ‘Company’s’ Theocratic Ministry School. Dickinson received no salary for his missionary or company servant work. He lived on $35 a month earned by a weekly average of five hours of radio repair work. This modest income, a low $15-17.50, a month rental for an apartment, self-performance of household tasks, and invitations to various private homes enabled Dickinson to subsist.” Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 339 , 393, 74 S.Ct. 152 , 156.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.