Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 U.S. 485 - Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776

Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

1,911
cited by 1,911 later decisions
174
cited 174 times by the Supreme Court
45
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

430 federal appellate · 119 district · 859 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,911 later decisions (174 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Vaca v. Sipes (1967), San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon (1959)

430 federal appellate · 119 district · 859 state decisions — followed in 45 states

603019541960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 141 (§ 1 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 178 (§ 208 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Texas Pacific Railway Company v. Abilene Cotton Oil Company · National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council · Munn v. Illinois

Cited together with San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. · United Const Workers Affiliated with United Mine Workers of America v. Laburnum Const Corp · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters · International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,911 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress did not merely lay down a substantive rule of law to be enforced by any tribunal competent to apply law generally to the parties. It went on to confide primary interpretation and application of its rules to a specific and specially constituted tribunal and prescribed a particular procedure for investigation, complaint and notice, and hearing and decision, including judicial relief pending a final administrative order.”
    108 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 157 of this title; (2) to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it: Provided, That subject to rules and regulations made and published by the Board pursuant to section 156 of this title, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to confer with him during working hours without loss of time or pay;(3) by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization: Provided, That nothing in this sub-chapter, or in any other statute of the United States, shall preclude an employer from making an agreement with a labor organization (not established, maintained, or assisted by any action defined in this subsection as an unfair labor practice) to require as a condition of employment membership therein on or after the thirtieth day following the beginning of such employment or the effective date of such agreement, whichever is the later, (i) if such labor organization is the representative of the employees as provided in section 159(a) of this title, in the appropriate collective-bargaining unit covered by such agreement when made, and (ii) unless following an election held as provided in section 159(e) of this title within one year preceding the effective date of such agre”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all of such activities except to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment as authorized in section 158(a) (3) of this title.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.