Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 346 U.S. 574 - Chicago Ri Pr Co v. Stude

Chicago Ri Pr Co v. Stude’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

579
cited by 579 later decisions
24
cited 24 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

187 federal appellate · 67 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 579 later decisions (24 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2021 · most notably Swint v. Chambers County Commission (1995), County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co. (1959)

187 federal appellate · 67 district · 13 state decisions

102019541960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Relies on Bell v. Hood · Burford v. Sun Oil Co. · Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets · Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp. · Boom Company v. Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 579 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the purpose of removal, the federal law determines who is plaintiff and who is defendant. It is a question of the construction of the federal statute on removal, and not the state statute.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “legislature may not make a federal district court, a court of original jurisdiction, into an appellate tribunal....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Obviously, such an order is not final and appealable if standing alone.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.