Casey v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Folkman v. Quamme · 338 Wis. 2d 215 - Olson v. Farrar · Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina · PALISADES COLLECTION LLC v. Kalal · 332 Wis. 2d 571 - Day v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the business of' Taylor Truck Line. Id., ¶ 10. ¶ 21. The court considered first the exclusion set forth in section 14(b) of Acceptance's policy. Quoting the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, the court stated that a tractor is being operated "in the business of' the lessee when "the truck is being used to further the commercial interests of the lessee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“LIABILITY-PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE. During the existence of this agreement, carrier will provide and maintain insurance coverage for the protection of the public from damage to persons and property, pursuant to its statutory obligations under 49 U.S.C. 10927.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The contractor shall have the responsibility to carrier of satisfying various regulatory requirements, and safety requirements of carrier and/or insurance company, by: A) Maintaining the equipment in the state of repair required by all applicable regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.