Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 A2D 590 - State v. LeBlanc

State v. LeBlanc’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2018

13 state decisions

8019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Abel v. United States · Cupp v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Probable cause exists where facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officers and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information would warrant a prudent and cautious person to believe that the arrestee did commit or is committing the felonious offense. 10”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “remote in time or place from the arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.