Ross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vickers v. State · Morrison v. Jennings · Hamilton v. Hamilton · Tauber v. State · Medlock v. Fort Smith Service Finance Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“who has not received fair warning; if, by his action, that individual clearly falls within the conduct proscribed by the statute, he cannot be heard to complain. Ross v. State , 347 Ark. 334 , 64 S.W.3d 272 (2002) ; Vickers v. State , 313 Ark. 64 , 852 S.W.2d 787 (1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.