Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

347 Ark. 369

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 2002

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 2002-01-10

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2007

8 state decisions

Relies on Rushing v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

P ER CURIAM.

¶1Thomas B. Devine, III, as a state-salaried, full-time public defender, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Phillip Williams, an indigent defendant, in this criminal case. Williams was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Mr. Devine timely filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and lodged the appellate record with the Supreme Court Clerk.

¶2 Mr. Devine now asks this court to relieve him as appellant’s counsel and to appoint new counsel. Mr. Devine cites Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000), that public defenders cannot be paid separately to file appeals.1 Accordingly, we grant Mr. Devine’s motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Mr. Tim Cullen will be substituted as appellant’s attorney in this matter.

IMBER, J., not participating.

¶3 Act 1370 of2001 provides that part-time public defenders may receive compensation from appellate courts.

/347/ark/369 · .json · Public domain