Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 F.2d 222 - Patrick J. Corcoran v. Mayor Samuel W. Yorty

Patrick J. Corcoran v. Mayor Samuel W. Yorty’s Empirical Analysis

347 F.2d 222 · 1965

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
July 2021
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Nevijel v. North Coast Life Insurance (1981), Gillibeau v. City of Richmond (1969)

10 federal appellate · 10 district ·

1001965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on R. W. Agnew v. Richard W. Moody

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, * * * shall contain (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, * * * (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief to which he deems himself entitled. Relief in the alternative or of several different types may be demanded.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[t]he present Second Amended Complaint * * * apparently alleges fraud and conspiracy in violation of civil rights. We use the word ‘apparently’ because the complaint, though a Second Amended Complaint, is so verbose, confused and redundant that its true substance, if any, is well disguised.” Corcoran v. Yorty, 347 F.2d 222, 223 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 966 , 86 S.Ct. 458 , 15 L.Ed.2d 370 (1965).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.