Standard Oil Co. v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis
347 F.2d 379 · 1965
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 6 district · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Williams v. Aetna Finance Co. (1998), McKinley v. City of Eloy (1983)
47 federal appellate · 6 district · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lavender v. Kurn · Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. · Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp. · New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Kinney · Walsh v. Walsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“flavor of misconduct must sufficiently permeate an entire proceeding to provide conviction that the jury was influenced by passion and prejudice in reaching its verdict.”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.