Hugh S. Knowles v. George C. Tibbetts’s Empirical Analysis
347 F.2d 591 · 1965
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1983 · most notably Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc. (1983), Steinberg v. Seitz (1975)
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Townsend v. Smith · Joshua C. Conner v. George G. Joris · Globe-Union, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co. · John O. Paivinen v. Eugene A. Sands
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Tibbetts has raised this issue throughout the interference and it must be decided. We thus remand for consideration of the 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.