Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 F.2d 636 - James U. Mann v. Byron H. Werner and Robert J. Reid

James U. Mann v. Byron H. Werner and Robert J. Reid’s Empirical Analysis

347 F.2d 636 · 1965

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
September 1998
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1998

1 district ·

1601965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. Hauck · Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusick · James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. Kass · Young Et Al. v. Orville H. Bullitt, Jr.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the purpose of corroborative evidence is to confirm and to strengthen the testimony of the inventor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.