Clarence Duke McGann v. United States Marshal, District of Maryland, Clarence Duke McGann v. United States

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

Clarence Duke McGANNv.UNITED STATES MARSHAL, DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Clarence Duke McGANNv.UNITED STATES of America

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued July 2, 1965. ,Decided July 6, 1965.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-07-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Peacock v. City of Greenwood · McGann v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-07-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1985

6 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore; Roszel C. Thomsen, Judge.

Lowell R. Bowen, Baltimore, Md. (Court-assigned counsel) for appellant.

Ronald T. Osborn, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Thomas J. Kenney, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion, 233 F.Supp. 419, the denial of the petition to vacate the Maryland sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is affirmed. This makes it unnecessary to consider the jurisdiction of the District Court of Maryland to entertain a habeas corpus petition attacking the New York conviction.

¶2

Affirmed.