Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 F.3d 138 - Hudson v. Coleman

Hudson v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis

347 F.3d 138 · 2003

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably IFC Interconsult, AG v. Safeguard International Partners, LLC (2006), Myers v. Richland County (2005)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

140200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Bender v. Williamsport Area School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The type of garnishment proceeding referred to in Peacock does not contemplate making the garnishee personally liable on the judgment based on some independent legal theory as [the plaintiff] seeks to do in this case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “legitimate, unresolved dispute[ ] concerning whether conduct occurs within the scope of employment or authority deprives a federal court of ancillary jurisdiction in a garnishment action pursuant to Peacock .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “hold[ing] the City individually liable under the indemnity clause for the full amount of the Officers' settlement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.