Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 347 F.3d 209 - Jens v. Barnhart

Jens v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

347 F.3d 209 · 2003

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. Finkelstein · Herron v. Shalala · Diaz v. Chater · Powers v. Apfel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not allowed to substitute its judgment for the ALJ's by reconsidering facts, reweighing evidence, resolving conflicts in evidence, or deciding questions of credibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In this case, the record provides adequate support for the ALJ's credibility finding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “sufficient for a reasonable person to accept as adequate to support the decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.